Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNoreen, Saima
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Malcolm David
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-10T14:10:01Z
dc.date.available2015-09-10T14:10:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-13
dc.identifier215918181
dc.identifiere46ac8d8-9faa-4303-beb2-d694bf6f39e3
dc.identifier000359492800026
dc.identifier84943155388
dc.identifier000359492800026
dc.identifier.citationNoreen , S & MacLeod , M D 2015 , ' What do we really know about cognitive inhibition? Task demands and inhibitory effects across a range of memory and behavioural tasks ' , PLoS One , vol. 10 , no. 8 , 0134951 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134951en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/7438
dc.descriptionThe authors (SN, principal investigator and MDM as co-investigator) received funding from the British Academy for this research (http://www.britac.ac.uk/). The grant number was SG111104.en
dc.description.abstractOur study explores inhibitory control across a range of widely recognised memory and behavioural tasks. Eighty-seven never-depressed participants completed a series of tasks designed to measure inhibitory control in memory and behaviour. Specifically, a variant of the selective retrieval-practice and the Think/No-Think tasks were employed as measures of memory inhibition. The Stroop-Colour Naming and the Go/No-Go tasks were used as measures of behavioural inhibition. Participants completed all 4 tasks. Task presentation order was counterbalanced across 3 separate testing sessions for each participant. Standard inhibitory forgetting effects emerged on both memory tasks but the extent of forgetting across these tasks was not correlated. Furthermore, there was no relationship between memory inhibition tasks and either of the main behavioural inhibition measures. At a time when cognitive inhibition continues to gain acceptance as an explanatory mechanism, our study raises fundamental questions about what we actually know about inhibition and how it is affected by the processing demands of particular inhibitory tasks.
dc.format.extent21
dc.format.extent281156
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.subjectSuppressing unwanted memoriesen
dc.subjectLatent-variable analysisen
dc.subjectLong-term-memoryen
dc.subjectautobiographical memoriesen
dc.subjectOlder-adultsen
dc.subjectIndividual-differencesen
dc.subjectThought substitutionen
dc.subjectEyewitness-memoryen
dc.subjectExecutive controlen
dc.subjectEpisodic memoryen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleWhat do we really know about cognitive inhibition? Task demands and inhibitory effects across a range of memory and behavioural tasksen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorThe British Academyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0134951
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134951#sec019en
dc.identifier.grantnumberSG111104en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record