St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Psychology & Neuroscience (School of)
  • Psychology & Neuroscience
  • Psychology & Neuroscience Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Psychology & Neuroscience (School of)
  • Psychology & Neuroscience
  • Psychology & Neuroscience Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Psychology & Neuroscience (School of)
  • Psychology & Neuroscience
  • Psychology & Neuroscience Theses
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Provide all the details that you can remember : assessing the quantity and quality of autobiographical retrieval

Thumbnail
View/Open
Irina-MariaLucaciuMPhilThesis.pdf (1.643Mb)
Date
06/12/2018
Author
Lucaciu, Irina-Maria
Supervisor
O'Connor, Akira Robert
Funder
Robert T. Jones Foundation
Keywords
Confidence
Memory
Autobiographical memory
Eyewitness testimony
Emotional memory
Personality
Memory accuracy
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Abstract
People asked to recall the memory of an event during testimony are encouraged to prioritize both quantity and quality – "the whole truth and nothing but the truth". Extensive research has shown that people can provide detailed, confident accounts that nevertheless prove to be inaccurate (Loftus, 1996). However, the question remains of how pressuring people to give confident and elaborate accounts of their memories subsequently changes these accounts. We conducted an experiment in which 51 participants provided accounts of autobiographical events and film plots (control condition), and later re-told these accounts under the instruction to retrieve more information. We measured the effects of task demands on the quantity (number of words and number of facts) and quality (confidence ratings) of information retrieved, as well as on the affective and cognitive language used during each account. Task demands at re-telling led to participants providing a greater amount of information, with their likelihood of doing so and their confidence in these newly communicated memory details linked to rumination tendencies and mood. These findings give insights into the cognitive processing of autobiographical memories, and provide a better understanding of the factors affecting eyewitness testimony.
Type
Thesis, MPhil Master of Philosophy
Collections
  • Psychology & Neuroscience Theses
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/16385

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter