Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMyrseth, Kristian Ove
dc.contributor.authorWollbrant, Conny
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-09T08:40:07Z
dc.date.available2015-06-09T08:40:07Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.identifier.citationMyrseth , K O & Wollbrant , C 2015 , ' Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option : Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) ' , Judgment and Decision Making , vol. 10 , no. 3 , pp. 277-279 . < http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.html >en
dc.identifier.issn1930-2975
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 189094207
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 27627da3-fa25-4b15-a29c-aaf1664da08b
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84930352511
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000355331200007
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1147-3025/work/119628642
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6788
dc.description.abstractKieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the reflexive, default behavior. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to discriminate between reflexive versus cognitively controlled behavioral responses. This is because cognitive conflict can emanate from resisting impulse successfully—or unsuccessfully.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJudgment and Decision Makingen
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)en
dc.subjectSocial dilemmaen
dc.subjectCooperationen
dc.subjectIntuitionen
dc.subjectCognitive conflicten
dc.subjectSelf-controlen
dc.subjectHM Sociologyen
dc.subjectBC Logicen
dc.subject.lccHMen
dc.subject.lccBCen
dc.titleLess cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option : Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014)en
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Managementen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Responsible Banking and Financeen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Economics and Financeen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journal.sjdm.org/vol10.3.htmlen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.htmlen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record