St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option : Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014)

Thumbnail
View/Open
Myrseth_Wollbrant_JDM2015.pdf (59.46Kb)
Date
05/2015
Author
Myrseth, Kristian Ove
Wollbrant, Conny
Keywords
Social dilemma
Cooperation
Intuition
Cognitive conflict
Self-control
HM Sociology
BC Logic
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Abstract
Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the reflexive, default behavior. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to discriminate between reflexive versus cognitively controlled behavioral responses. This is because cognitive conflict can emanate from resisting impulse successfully—or unsuccessfully.
Citation
Myrseth , K O & Wollbrant , C 2015 , ' Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option : Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) ' , Judgment and Decision Making , vol. 10 , no. 3 , pp. 277-279 . < http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.html >
Publication
Judgment and Decision Making
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1930-2975
Type
Journal item
Rights
Copyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Collections
  • Centre for Responsible Banking and Finance Research
  • Management Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
URL
http://journal.sjdm.org/vol10.3.html
http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.html
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/6788

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter