The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 4 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Final.pdf84.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Anti-symmetry and non-extensional mereology
Authors: Cotnoir, Aaron
Keywords: BC Logic
Issue Date: Apr-2010
Citation: Cotnoir , A 2010 , ' Anti-symmetry and non-extensional mereology ' The Philosophical Quarterly , vol 60 , no. 239 , pp. 396-405 . , 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.649.x
Abstract: I examine the link between extensionality principles of classical mereology and the anti-symmetry of parthood. Varzi’s most recent defence of extensionality depends crucially on assuming anti-symmetry. I examine the notions of proper parthood, weak supplementation and non-well-foundedness. By rejecting anti-symmetry, the anti-extensionalist has a unified, independently grounded response to Varzi’s arguments. I give a formal construction of a non-extensional mereology in which antisymmetry fails. If the notion of ‘mereological equivalence’ is made explicit, this non-anti-symmetric mereology recaptures all of the structure of classical mereology.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 0031-8094
Type: Journal article
Rights: © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly. The definitive version is available at
Appears in Collections:Philosophy Research
University of St Andrews Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)