Files in this item
Anti-symmetry and non-extensional mereology
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Cotnoir, Aaron | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-20T14:01:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-20T14:01:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cotnoir , A 2010 , ' Anti-symmetry and non-extensional mereology ' , The Philosophical Quarterly , vol. 60 , no. 239 , pp. 396-405 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.649.x | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8094 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 27619288 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: a88f35ae-f9f6-4747-b52c-f16fe080e7e1 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 77949967780 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-4528-7570/work/65702594 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/3081 | |
dc.description.abstract | I examine the link between extensionality principles of classical mereology and the anti-symmetry of parthood. Varzi’s most recent defence of extensionality depends crucially on assuming anti-symmetry. I examine the notions of proper parthood, weak supplementation and non-well-foundedness. By rejecting anti-symmetry, the anti-extensionalist has a unified, independently grounded response to Varzi’s arguments. I give a formal construction of a non-extensional mereology in which antisymmetry fails. If the notion of ‘mereological equivalence’ is made explicit, this non-anti-symmetric mereology recaptures all of the structure of classical mereology. | |
dc.format.extent | 9 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Philosophical Quarterly | en |
dc.rights | © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly. The definitive version is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com | en |
dc.subject | BC Logic | en |
dc.subject.lcc | BC | en |
dc.title | Anti-symmetry and non-extensional mereology | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Postprint | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Philosophy | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.649.x | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.