Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSandmann, Frank G.
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorBernard-Stoecklin, Sibylle
dc.contributor.authorCasado, Itziar
dc.contributor.authorCastilla, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorDomegan, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorGherasim, Alin
dc.contributor.authorHooiveld, Mariëtte
dc.contributor.authorKislaya, Irina
dc.contributor.authorLarrauri, Amparo
dc.contributor.authorLevy-Bruhl, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ausenda
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Diogo F.P.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Baz, Iván
dc.contributor.authorMazagatos, Clara
dc.contributor.authorMcMenamin, Jim
dc.contributor.authorMeijer, Adam
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Josephine L.K.
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Baltazar
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Joan
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Arlene
dc.contributor.authorThorrington, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorPebody, Richard
dc.contributor.authorBaguelin, Marc
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T12:30:02Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T12:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-23
dc.identifier280688878
dc.identifier16064341-4a3f-4ffc-86bb-1c1d0c00fafa
dc.identifier85123861137
dc.identifier35109968
dc.identifier.citationSandmann , F G , van Leeuwen , E , Bernard-Stoecklin , S , Casado , I , Castilla , J , Domegan , L , Gherasim , A , Hooiveld , M , Kislaya , I , Larrauri , A , Levy-Bruhl , D , Machado , A , Marques , D F P , Martínez-Baz , I , Mazagatos , C , McMenamin , J , Meijer , A , Murray , J L K , Nunes , B , O'Donnell , J , Reynolds , A , Thorrington , D , Pebody , R & Baguelin , M 2022 , ' Health and economic impact of seasonal influenza mass vaccination strategies in European settings : a mathematical modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis ' , Vaccine , vol. 40 , no. 9 , pp. 1306-1315 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.015en
dc.identifier.issn0264-410X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1511-7944/work/116910273
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26077
dc.descriptionThis study was conducted as part of the I-MOVE+ (Integrated Monitoring of Vaccines in Europe) project, which had received a grant from the European Commission Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 634446). MB also thanks the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Modelling Methodology at Imperial College London in partnership with UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) for funding (grant HPRU-2012–10080).en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction : Despite seasonal influenza vaccination programmes in most countries targeting individuals aged ≥ 65 (or ≥ 55) years and high risk-groups, significant disease burden remains. We explored the impact and cost-effectiveness of 27 vaccination programmes targeting the elderly and/or children in eight European settings (n = 205.8 million).  Methods : We used an age-structured dynamic-transmission model to infer age- and (sub-)type-specific seasonal influenza virus infections calibrated to England, France, Ireland, Navarra, The Netherlands, Portugal, Scotland, and Spain between 2010/11 and 2017/18. The base-case vaccination scenario consisted of non-adjuvanted, non-high dose trivalent vaccines (TV) and no universal paediatric vaccination. We explored i) moving the elderly to “improved” (i.e., adjuvanted or high-dose) trivalent vaccines (iTV) or non-adjuvanted non-high-dose quadrivalent vaccines (QV); ii) adopting mass paediatric vaccination with TV or QV; and iii) combining the elderly and paediatric strategies. We estimated setting-specific costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the healthcare perspective, and discounted QALYs at 3.0%.  Results : In the elderly, the estimated numbers of infection per 100,000 population are reduced by a median of 261.5 (range across settings: 154.4, 475.7) when moving the elderly to iTV and by 150.8 (77.6, 262.3) when moving them to QV. Through indirect protection, adopting mass paediatric programmes with 25% uptake achieves similar reductions in the elderly of 233.6 using TV (range: 58.9, 425.6) or 266.5 using QV (65.7, 477.9), with substantial health gains from averted infections across ages. At €35,000/QALY gained, moving the elderly to iTV plus adopting mass paediatric QV programmes provides the highest mean net benefits and probabilities of being cost-effective in all settings and paediatric coverage levels.  Conclusion : Given the direct and indirect protection, and depending on the vaccine prices, model results support a combination of having moved the elderly to an improved vaccine and adopting universal paediatric vaccination programmes across the European settings.
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent2885252
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofVaccineen
dc.subjectEconomic evaluationen
dc.subjectInfluenzaen
dc.subjectMathematical modelen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectPublic healthen
dc.subjectVaccinationen
dc.subjectMolecular Medicineen
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiology(all)en
dc.subjectInfectious Diseasesen
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Healthen
dc.subjectveterinary(all)en
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectNISen
dc.titleHealth and economic impact of seasonal influenza mass vaccination strategies in European settings : a mathematical modelling and cost-effectiveness analysisen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Education Divisionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.015
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record