Files in this item
A note on equiprobability prior to 1500
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Thakkar, Mark Nicholas Andrew | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-27T09:30:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-27T09:30:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Thakkar , M N A 2022 , ' A note on equiprobability prior to 1500 ' , Early Science and Medicine , vol. 27 , no. 2 , pp. 225-231 . https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-20220042 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1383-7427 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 280603162 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 20934b37-26a2-4411-9bb2-439723277671 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85133531364 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/25721 | |
dc.description.abstract | Rudolf Schuessler has argued that sixteenth-century thinkers developed a concept of equal probability that was virtually absent before 1500 and that may have contributed to the birth of mathematical probability shortly after 1650. This note uses additional textual evidence to argue that the concept of equal probability was in fact generally available to medieval thinkers. It is true that ascriptions of equal probability are comparatively rare in medieval texts, but this can be explained without positing a conceptual blind spot. | |
dc.format.extent | 7 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Early Science and Medicine | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © Mark Thakkar, 2022. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license | en |
dc.subject | History of probability | en |
dc.subject | Probable opinion | en |
dc.subject | Scholasticism | en |
dc.subject | Medieval | en |
dc.subject | Latin | en |
dc.subject | QA Mathematics | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject | NIS | en |
dc.subject | MCC | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QA | en |
dc.title | A note on equiprobability prior to 1500 | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of History | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-20220042 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.