Psychometric properties of the Chinese version Fear of Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire-7 (FCR-7)
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
This article investigates the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the 7-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire (FCR-7). A total of 1,025 cancer patients were recruited and asked to complete the Chinese FCR-7, Fear of Progression Questionnaire—Short Form (FoP-Q–SF), 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and 7-item General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). The internal consistency and test–retest reliabilities were examined. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted on random split-half samples. Overall relationships of FCR-7 with other psychological constructs were examined. The Chinese FCR-7 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .87), test–retest reliability (r = .90), and item–total correlations (range = .583–.872). The unitary factor structure was supported by the EFA and the CFA fit statistics (comparative fit index = .99, root-mean-square error of approximation = .039, 95% confidence interval [.01, .07]). The total score of FCR-7 was positively associated with FoP-Q–SF (r = .756, p < .01), PHQ-9 (r = .522, p < .01), and GAD-7 (r = .553, p < .01). Patients with low monthly income (p < .001) and family cancer history (p = .012) and those who had gone through chemotherapy (p = .001) tended to report higher fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). The FCR-7 has been translated and successfully culturally adapted into a Chinese version. It is a reliable and valid measurement for assessing FCR.
Yang , Y , Humphris , G , Sun , H , Li , W , Hao , Y , Liu , T , Zhang , J , Wang , H & Zhang , B 2019 , ' Psychometric properties of the Chinese version Fear of Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire-7 (FCR-7) ' , Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , vol. Online First . https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000257
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
© 2019, American Psychological Association. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000257
DescriptionFunding: President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (2017L001); Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (201804010132); Key Item of Guangzhou bureau of education (2019KC106), and Innovation Item of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (2018A043442).
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.