Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorYang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorHumphris, Gerry
dc.contributor.authorSun, Hengwen
dc.contributor.authorLi, Wengao
dc.contributor.authorHao, Yanli
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ting
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jingying
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hongmei
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bin
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-07T09:30:04Z
dc.date.available2019-08-07T09:30:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-25
dc.identifier.citationYang , Y , Humphris , G , Sun , H , Li , W , Hao , Y , Liu , T , Zhang , J , Wang , H & Zhang , B 2019 , ' Psychometric properties of the Chinese version Fear of Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire-7 (FCR-7) ' , Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , vol. Online First . https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000257en
dc.identifier.issn0735-7028
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 259395286
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a79cf7c0-b7fa-4d93-b6b5-1e97524b2771
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4601-8834/work/64033827
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85076872668
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000500013500003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/18259
dc.descriptionFunding: President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (2017L001); Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (201804010132); Key Item of Guangzhou bureau of education (2019KC106), and Innovation Item of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (2018A043442).en
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the 7-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire (FCR-7). A total of 1,025 cancer patients were recruited and asked to complete the Chinese FCR-7, Fear of Progression Questionnaire—Short Form (FoP-Q–SF), 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and 7-item General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). The internal consistency and test–retest reliabilities were examined. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted on random split-half samples. Overall relationships of FCR-7 with other psychological constructs were examined. The Chinese FCR-7 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .87), test–retest reliability (r = .90), and item–total correlations (range = .583–.872). The unitary factor structure was supported by the EFA and the CFA fit statistics (comparative fit index = .99, root-mean-square error of approximation = .039, 95% confidence interval [.01, .07]). The total score of FCR-7 was positively associated with FoP-Q–SF (r = .756, p < .01), PHQ-9 (r = .522, p < .01), and GAD-7 (r = .553, p < .01). Patients with low monthly income (p < .001) and family cancer history (p = .012) and those who had gone through chemotherapy (p = .001) tended to report higher fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). The FCR-7 has been translated and successfully culturally adapted into a Chinese version. It is a reliable and valid measurement for assessing FCR.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProfessional Psychology: Research and Practiceen
dc.rights© 2019, American Psychological Association. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000257en
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titlePsychometric properties of the Chinese version Fear of Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire-7 (FCR-7)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sir James Mackenzie Institute for Early Diagnosisen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.WHO Collaborating Centre for International Child & Adolescent Health Policyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000257
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-07-25


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record