Automated tumour budding quantification by machine learning augments TNM staging in muscle-invasive bladder cancer prognosis
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Tumour budding has been described as an independent prognostic feature in several tumour types. We report for the first time the relationship between tumour budding and survival evaluated in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. A machine learning-based methodology was applied to accurately quantify tumour buds across immunofluorescence labelled whole slide images from 100 muscle invasive bladder cancer patients. Furthermore, tumour budding was found to be correlated to TNM (p = 0.00089) and pT (p = 0.0078) staging. A novel classification and regression tree model was constructed to stratify all stage II, III, and IV patients into three new staging criteria based on disease specific survival. For the stratification of non-metastatic patients into high or low risk of disease specific death, our decision tree model reported that tumour budding was the most significant feature (HR = 2.59, p = 0.0091), and no clinical feature was utilised to categorise these patients. Our findings demonstrate that tumour budding, quantified using automated image analysis provides prognostic value for muscle invasive bladder cancer patients and a better model fit than TNM staging.
Brieu , N , Gavriel , C , Nearchou , I P , Harrison , D J , Schmidt , G & Caie , P D 2019 , ' Automated tumour budding quantification by machine learning augments TNM staging in muscle-invasive bladder cancer prognosis ' , Scientific Reports , vol. 9 , 5174 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41595-2
Copyright 2019 the Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.