Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSchuert, Courtney
dc.contributor.authorPomeroy, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorTwiss, Sean
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T10:30:11Z
dc.date.available2018-10-17T10:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-16
dc.identifier255932668
dc.identifier0f248f59-9a4c-4bc1-8658-1e384fc9de41
dc.identifier85054869267
dc.identifier.citationSchuert , C , Pomeroy , P & Twiss , S 2018 , ' Assessing the utility and limitations of accelerometers and machine learning approaches in classifying behaviour during lactation in a phocid seal ' , Animal Biotelemetry , vol. 6 , 14 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0158-yen
dc.identifier.issn2050-3385
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1603-5630/work/49580160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16253
dc.descriptionFunding for this work was provided by the Durham Doctoral Studentship scheme at Durham University and supported by Natural Environment Research Council’s core funding to the Sea Mammal Research Unit at the University of St. Andrews.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Classifying behaviour with animal-borne accelerometers is quickly becoming a popular tool for remotely observing behavioural states in a variety of species. Most accelerometry work in pinnipeds has focused on classifying behaviour at sea often quantifying behavioural trade-offs associated with foraging and diving in income breeders. Very little work to date has been done to resolve behaviour during the critical period of lactation in a capital breeder. Capital breeding phocids possess finite reserves that they must allocate appropriately to maintain themselves and their new offspring during their brief nursing period. Within this short time, fine-scale behavioural trade-offs can have significant fitness consequences for mother and offspring and must be carefully managed. Here, we present a case study in extracting and classifying lactation behaviours in a wild, breeding pinniped, the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus). Results:  Using random forest models, we were able to resolve 4 behavioural states that constitute the majority of a female grey seals’ activity budget during lactation. Resting, alert, nursing, and a form of pup interaction were extracted and classified reliably. For the first time, we quantified the potential confounding variance associated with individual differences in a wild context as well as differences due to sampling location in a largely inactive model species. Conclusions:  At this stage, the majority of a female grey seal’s activity budget was classified well using accelerometers, but some rare and context-dependent behaviours were not well captured. While we did find significant variation between individuals in behavioural mechanics, individuals did not differ significantly within themselves; inter-individual variability should be an important consideration in future efforts. These methods can be extended to other efforts to study grey seals and other pinnipeds who exhibit a capital breeding system. Using accelerometers to classify behaviour during lactation allows for fine-scale assessments of time and energy trade-offs for species with fixed stores.
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent1340526
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Biotelemetryen
dc.subjectAccelerometeren
dc.subjectGrey sealen
dc.subjectMaternal behaviouren
dc.subjectBreeding behaviouren
dc.subjectMachine learningen
dc.subjectClassificationen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectNERCen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleAssessing the utility and limitations of accelerometers and machine learning approaches in classifying behaviour during lactation in a phocid sealen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40317-018-0158-y
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record