How many angels can be in the same place at the same time? A defense of mereological universalism
MetadataShow full item record
I reply to Hawthorne and Uzquiano's (2011) arguments for the incompatibility between mereological universalism and plenitudinous co-location. I argue that a mereology in which antisymmetry for parthood fails is independently motivated, and allows for both universalism and plenitudinous co-location. There can be as many angels in a place as there are cardinalities.
Cotnoir , A 2016 , ' How many angels can be in the same place at the same time? A defense of mereological universalism ' Mind , vol. 125 , no. 500 , pp. 959-965 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv158
© Cotnoir 2016. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv158
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.