Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCotnoir, Aaron
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-30T23:49:56Z
dc.date.available2018-09-30T23:49:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier183719035
dc.identifiercf742362-e39f-4d97-95fc-dac47c854b04
dc.identifier000386946000002
dc.identifier000386946000002
dc.identifier84992588805
dc.identifier.citationCotnoir , A 2016 , ' How many angels can be in the same place at the same time? A defense of mereological universalism ' , Mind , vol. 125 , no. 500 , pp. 959-965 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv158en
dc.identifier.issn0026-4423
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4528-7570/work/65702608
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16113
dc.description.abstractI reply to Hawthorne and Uzquiano's (2011) arguments for the incompatibility between mereological universalism and plenitudinous co-location. I argue that a mereology in which antisymmetry for parthood fails is independently motivated, and allows for both universalism and plenitudinous co-location. There can be as many angels in a place as there are cardinalities.
dc.format.extent7
dc.format.extent60978
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMinden
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleHow many angels can be in the same place at the same time? A defense of mereological universalismen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv158
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-10-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record