St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Animal origin of 13th-century uterine vellum revealed using noninvasive peptide fingerprinting

Thumbnail
View/Open
Rudy_Fingerprinting_PNAS_Submitted.pdf (779.8Kb)
Date
08/12/2015
Author
Fiddyment, Sarah
Holsinger, Bruce
Ruzzier, Chiara
Devine, Alexander
Binois, Annelise
Albarella, Umberto
Fischer, Roman
Nichols, Emma
Curtis, Antoinette
Cheese, Edward
Teasdale, Matthew D.
Checkley-Scott, Caroline
Milner, Stephen J.
Rudy, Kathryn Margaret
Johnson, Eric J.
Vnouček, Jiří
Garrison, Mary
McGrory, Simon
Bradley, Daniel G.
Collins, Matthew J.
Keywords
Pocket Bible
Parchment
Vellum
Collagen
Mass spectrometry
D History (General)
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
Tissue-thin parchment made it possible to produce the first pocket Bibles: Thousands were made in the 13th century. The source of this parchment, often called “uterine vellum,” has been a long-standing controversy in codicology. Use of the Latin term abortivum in many sources has led some scholars to suggest that the skin of fetal calves or sheep was used. Others have argued that it would not be possible to sustain herds if so many pocket Bibles were produced from fetal skins, arguing instead for unexpected alternatives, such as rabbit. Here, we report a simple and objective technique using standard conservation treatments to identify the animal origin of parchment. The noninvasive method is a variant on zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS) peptide mass fingerprinting but extracts protein from the parchment surface by using an electrostatic charge generated by gentle rubbing of a PVC eraser on the membrane surface. Using this method, we analyzed 72 pocket Bibles originating in France, England, and Italy and 293 additional parchment samples that bracket this period. We found no evidence for the use of unexpected animals; however, we did identify the use of more than one mammal species in a single manuscript, consistent with the local availability of hides. These results suggest that ultrafine vellum does not necessarily derive from the use of abortive or newborn animals with ultrathin hides, but could equally well reflect a production process that allowed the skins of maturing animals of several species to be rendered into vellum of equal quality and fineness.
Citation
Fiddyment , S , Holsinger , B , Ruzzier , C , Devine , A , Binois , A , Albarella , U , Fischer , R , Nichols , E , Curtis , A , Cheese , E , Teasdale , M D , Checkley-Scott , C , Milner , S J , Rudy , K M , Johnson , E J , Vnouček , J , Garrison , M , McGrory , S , Bradley , D G & Collins , M J 2015 , ' Animal origin of 13th-century uterine vellum revealed using noninvasive peptide fingerprinting ' , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , vol. 112 , no. 49 , pp. 15066-15071 . https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512264112
Publication
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512264112
ISSN
1091-6490
Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright 2015 the Authors. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1035166.
Description
The authors acknowledge Science Foundation Ireland European Research Council (ERC) Support Award 12/ERC/B2227, Valeria Mattiangeli, and the Trinity Genome Sequencing Laboratory (TrinSeq) for MiSeq support. This work was supported by the Marie Curie International Fellowship PALIMPSEST FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF 299101, a University of Manchester Research Institute seedcorn grant, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship funding, and ERC Investigator Grant 295729-CodeX.
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URL
http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26598667
http://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1512264112/-/DCSupplemental
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/9040

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter