Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorAnsari, Ali Massoud
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-08T10:30:06Z
dc.date.available2016-06-08T10:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-13
dc.identifier241630188
dc.identifierbf040917-b2b6-4c3c-8c89-bfb57d465477
dc.identifier85022007125
dc.identifier000378823700005
dc.identifier.citationAnsari , A M 2017 , ' Taqizadeh and European civilisation ' , Iran: Journal of British Institute of Persian Studies , vol. 54 , no. 1 , pp. 47-58 . https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2016.11882300en
dc.identifier.issn0578-6967
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8947
dc.description.abstractThe leading Iranian intellectual and nationalist Hasan Taqizadeh has been roundly condemned by posterity for his call to Iranians to embrace European civilisation in its entirety without qualification or compromise. Taqizadeh himself later conceded that the form of words he had used were injudicious, but he added that his intention had been to galvanise Iranians out of their self-destructive political stupor and it remains a reality that many of Taqizadeh's contemporaries were supportive of his call to arms. This paper reassesses Taqizadeh's position in the context of his historical and intellectual environment, which it is argued drew heavily from a “Whig” reading of the Enlightenment progress. It shows that Taqizadeh was not alone in drawing on this narrative while maintaining an important distinction between the positive aspects of British political thought and the shortcomings of British policy.
dc.format.extent191169
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIran: Journal of British Institute of Persian Studiesen
dc.subjectTaqizadehen
dc.subjectCivilisationen
dc.subjectWhigen
dc.subjectEnlightenmenten
dc.subjectBritainen
dc.subjectal-Afghanien
dc.subjectMalkom Khanen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleTaqizadeh and European civilisationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Global Law and Governanceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2016.11882300
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record