Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorTausch, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorKenworthy, Jared B.
dc.contributor.authorHewstone, Miles
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-15T14:40:04Z
dc.date.available2016-01-15T14:40:04Z
dc.date.issued2007-03
dc.identifier.citationTausch , N , Kenworthy , J B & Hewstone , M 2007 , ' The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited : does content matter? ' , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , vol. 92 , no. 3 , pp. 542-556 . https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3514
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 4631003
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 63de3ea9-dc0b-4899-bd29-fa521a705ce2
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000244629500011
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 33947517651
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9471-0673/work/46362104
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8024
dc.description.abstractM. Rothbart and B. Park (1986) demonstrated that, consistent with the common negativity bias, positive traits are difficult to confirm and easy to disconfirm, whereas the opposite is true for negative traits. This article extends their analysis by showing that trait (dis-) confirmability is moderated by trait content (warmth vs. competence). Study I identifies a trait sample representative of warmth and competence. Study 2 shows a strong negativity effect for warmth and a reduced (or absent) negativity effect for competence. Study 3 examines trait properties related to the behavioral range of the trait possessor and to the motivational goals of the perceiver as predictors of trait (dis-) confirmability. The theoretical and practical implications of the authors' findings are discussed, and avenues for future research are suggested.
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyen
dc.rightsCopyright 2007 APA, all rights reserved. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542en
dc.subjectSocial perceptionen
dc.subjectTrait attributionen
dc.subjectTrait disconfirmabilityen
dc.subjectBehavior diagnosticityen
dc.subjectMotivationen
dc.subjectAttributionen
dc.subjectAttentionen
dc.subjectModelen
dc.subjectDispositionsen
dc.subjectImpressionsen
dc.subjectCompetenceen
dc.subjectPerceptionen
dc.subjectPrejudiceen
dc.subjectBehaviorsen
dc.subjectMoralityen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleThe confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited : does content matter?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record