Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorUzquiano, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T12:10:02Z
dc.date.available2015-08-06T12:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-06
dc.identifier.citationUzquiano , G 2015 , ' A neglected resolution of Russell's paradox of propositions ' , The Review of Symbolic Logic , vol. 8 , no. 2 , pp. 328-344 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020315000106en
dc.identifier.issn1755-0203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 205543567
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1170354e-5d81-453c-af4f-b9f4bf86686d
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84929665413
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000354784800007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/7136
dc.description.abstractBertrand Russell offered an influential paradox of propositions in Appendix B of "The Principles of Mathematics", but there is little agreement as to what to conclude from it. We suggest that Russell’s paradox is best regarded as a limitative result on propositional granularity. Some propositions are, on pain of contradiction, unable to discriminate between classes with different members: whatever they predicate of one, they predicate of the other. When accepted, this remarkable fact should cast some doubt upon some of the uses to which modern descendants of Russell’s paradox of propositions have been put in recent literature.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Review of Symbolic Logicen
dc.rightsCopyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2015. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755020315000106en
dc.subjectBC Logicen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccBCen
dc.titleA neglected resolution of Russell's paradox of propositionsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020315000106
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record