St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Mathematics & Statistics (School of)
  • Statistics
  • Statistics Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Mathematics & Statistics (School of)
  • Statistics
  • Statistics Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Mathematics & Statistics (School of)
  • Statistics
  • Statistics Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The importance of analysis method for breeding bird survey population trend estimates

Thumbnail
View/Open
Thomas_The importance of analysis method for breeding bird survey population trend estimates_postprint.pdf (96.74Kb)
Date
1996
Author
Thomas, Len
Martin, Kathy
Keywords
analysis of biological population trends
North American Breeding Bird Survey
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Abstract
Population trends from the Breeding Bird Survey are widely used to focus conservation efforts on species thought to be in decline and to test preliminary hypotheses regarding the causes of these declines. A number of statistical methods have been used to estimate population trends, but there is no consensus us to which is the most reliable. We quantified differences in trend estimates or different analysis methods applied to the same subset of Breeding Bird Survey data. We estimated trends for 115 species in British Columbia using three analysis methods: U.S. National Biological Service route regression, Canadian Wildlife Service route regression, and nonparametric rank-trends analysis. Overall, the number of species estimated to be declining was similar among the three methods, but the number of statistically significant declines was not similar (15, 8, and 29 respectively). In addition, many differences existed among methods in the trend estimates assigned to individual species. Comparing the two route regression methods, Canadian Wildlife Service estimates had a greater absolute magnitude on average than those of the U.S. National Biological Service method. U.S. National Biological Service estimates were on average more positive than the Canadian Wildlife Service estimates when the respective agency's data selection criteria were applied separately. These results imply that our ability to detect population declines and to prioritize species of conservation concern depend strongly upon the analysis method used. This highlights the need for further research to determine how best to accurately estimate trends from the data. We suggest a method for evaluating the performance of the analysis methods by using simulated Breeding Bird Survey data.
Citation
Conservation Biology 10(2): 479-490 April 1996
ISSN
0888-8892
Type
Journal article
Collections
  • Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling (CREEM) Research
  • Statistics Research
URI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020479.x
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/685

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter