Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDilley, Roy Martin
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-18T16:31:09Z
dc.date.available2014-11-18T16:31:09Z
dc.date.issued2009-02
dc.identifier.citationDilley , R M 2009 , ' Specialist knowledge practices of craftsmen and clerics in Senegal ' , Africa , vol. 79 , no. 1 , pp. 53-70 . https://doi.org/10.3366/E0001972008000600en
dc.identifier.issn0001-9720
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 347770
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 47351322-b8b0-4137-8092-e9194227d9f9
dc.identifier.otherstandrews_research_output: 14998
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 67651226923
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8315-9011/work/90112873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/5790
dc.descriptionSpecial Issue: Knowledge in Practice: Expertise and the Transmission of Knowledge. Guest Editor: Kai Kresse and Trevor H. J. Marchanden
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the specialized knowledge practices of two sets of culturally recognized ‘experts’ in Senegal: Islamic clerics and craftsmen. Their respective bodies of knowledge are often regarded as being in opposition, and in some respects antithetical, to one another. The aim of this article is to examine this claim by means of an investigation of how knowledge is conceived by each party. The analysis attempts to expose local epistemologies, which are deduced from an investigation of ‘expert’ knowledge practices and indigenous claims to knowledge. The social processes of knowledge acquisition and transmission are also examined with reference to the idea of initiatory learning. It is in these areas that commonalities between the bodies of knowledge and sets of knowledge practices are to be found. Yet, despite parallels between the epistemologies of both bodies of expertise and between their respective modes of knowledge transmission, the social consequences of ‘expertise’ are different in each case. The hierarchical relations of power that inform the articulation of the dominant clerics with marginalized craftsmen groups serve to profile ‘expertise’ in different ways, each one implying its own sense of authority and social range of legitimacy.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAfricaen
dc.rightsCopyright © International African Institute 2009. This is the published version of this article, deposited according to publisher policy.en
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.titleSpecialist knowledge practices of craftsmen and clerics in Senegalen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Social Anthropologyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3366/E0001972008000600
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651226923&partnerID=8YFLogxKen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record