Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDaube, Marc Philip Klaus
dc.contributor.authorUlph, David Tregear
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T16:31:01Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T16:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier.citationDaube , M P K & Ulph , D T 2016 , ' Moral behaviour, altruism and environmental policy ' , Environmental and Resource Economics , vol. 63 , no. 2 , pp. 505-522 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9836-2en
dc.identifier.issn0924-6460
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 94835540
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f2f96179-1092-4e8c-b7f2-02884719e28c
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84957848281
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3171-1270/work/59464519
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000369314800015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/5577
dc.descriptionMarc Daube gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Economic and Social Research Council, grant number ES/J500136/1en
dc.description.abstractFree-riding is often associated with self-interested behaviour. However if there is a global mixed pollutant, free-riding will arise if individuals calculate that their emissions are negligible relative to the total, so total emissions and hence any damage that they and others suffer will be unaffected by whatever consumption choice they make. In this context consumer behaviour and the optimal environmental tax are independent of the degree of altruism. For behaviour to change, individuals need to make their decisions in a different way. We propose a new theory of moral behaviour whereby individuals recognise that they will be worse off by not acting in their own self-interest, and balance this cost off against the hypothetical moral value of adopting a Kantian form of behaviour, that is by calculating the consequences of their action by asking what would happen if everyone else acted in the same way as they did. We show that: (a) if individuals behave this way, then altruism matters and the greater the degree of altruism the more individuals cut back their consumption of a ’dirty’ good; (b) nevertheless the optimal environmental tax is exactly the same as that emerging from classical analysis where individuals act in self-interested fashion.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental and Resource Economicsen
dc.rights© 2014. The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.en
dc.subjectAltruismen
dc.subjectClimate changeen
dc.subjectEnvironmental Taxen
dc.subjectExternalitiesen
dc.subjectMoral Behaviouren
dc.subjectPro-social behavioren
dc.subjectPublic goodsen
dc.subjectHB Economic Theoryen
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Finance(all)en
dc.subject.lccHBen
dc.titleMoral behaviour, altruism and environmental policyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Economics and Financeen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9836-2
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record