Kantian dilemmas? Moral conflict in Kant’s ethical theory
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
This paper explores the possibility of moral conflict in Kant’s ethics. An analysis of the only explicit discussion of the topic in his published writings confirms that there is no room for genuine moral dilemmas. Conflict is limited to nonconclusive ‘grounds’ of obligation. They arise only in the sphere of ethical duty and, though defeasible, ought to be construed as the result of valid arguments an agent correctly judges to apply in the situation at hand. While it is difficult to determine in theory what makes some of them stronger than others, these ‘grounds’ can account for practical residue in conflict cases and for a plausible form of agent regret. The principle that ‘ought implies can’ survives intact.
Timmermann , J 2013 , ' Kantian dilemmas? Moral conflict in Kant’s ethical theory ' , Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie , vol. 95 , no. 1 , pp. 36-64 . https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2013-0002
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
Copyright © 2011–2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH. The final publication is available at www.degruyter.com
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.