Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRapport, Nigel Julian
dc.identifier.citationRapport , N J 2011 , ' The liberal treatment of difference : an untimely meditation on culture and civilization ' , Current Anthropology , vol. 52 , no. 5 , pp. 687-710 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 16905697
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 110c2a96-f846-484d-a033-aa00575c661c
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 80053470973
dc.description.abstractJohn Stuart Mill’s liberal vision included a notion of “civil advancement” whereby the free expression of a diversity of opinion would result not only in an initial collision of difference but also in an eventual consolidation as truth. The work of this article is to explore the ways and extents in which such liberalism can translate into a cosmopolitan anthropology. Is toleration of difference the appropriate anthropological ethic, or can one hypothesize a liberal “magnanimous” overcoming of difference? In a wide-ranging discussion, the voice of Mill is juxtaposed against those of C. P. Snow, Ernest Gellner, Stevie Smith, and Karl Popper. Much commentary would suggest that liberalism is passé. A political context dominated by renascent particularisms, militant religions, and resurgent ethnicities spells the collapse, it is told, of any Enlightenment project of liberal-humanist universalism. “Cultures are not options.” Notwithstanding, the argument is made here that as “opinion” grades into “knowledge,” so “culture” grades into “civilization” and local community (polis) into global society (cosmos). Difference may become a step along the way to a recognition of universal human truth.
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Anthropologyen
dc.rights© 2011 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.en
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.titleThe liberal treatment of difference : an untimely meditation on culture and civilizationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Social Anthropologyen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record