Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHamzah, Jemaima Che
dc.contributor.authorBurr, Jennifer Margaret
dc.contributor.authorRamsay, Craig R.
dc.contributor.authorAzuara-Blanco, Augusto
dc.contributor.authorPrior, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T15:01:00Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T15:01:00Z
dc.date.issued2011-09
dc.identifier.citationHamzah , J C , Burr , J M , Ramsay , C R , Azuara-Blanco , A & Prior , M 2011 , ' Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research : a systematic review of vision instruments ' , Quality of Life Research , vol. 20 , no. 7 , pp. 1141-1158 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1en
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 16572690
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2d6c721a-e817-49b3-a301-4dd37e97a822
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000294261100018
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 80052305460
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4203
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To identify vision Patient-Reported Outcomes instruments relevant to glaucoma and assess their content validity. Methods: MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and SCOPUS (to January 2009) were systematically searched. Observational studies or randomised controlled trials, published in English, reporting use of vision instruments in glaucoma studies involving adults were included. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify additional studies describing development and/or validation to ascertain the final version of the instruments. Instruments' content was then mapped onto a theoretical framework, the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and quality assessed instrument content. Results: Thirty-three instruments were identified. Instruments were categorised into thirteen vision status, two vision disability, one vision satisfaction, five glaucoma status, one glaucoma medication related to health status, five glaucoma medication side effects and six glaucoma medication satisfaction measures according to each instruments' content. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25, Impact of Vision Impairment and Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure had the highest number of positive ratings in the content validity assessment. Conclusion: This study provides a descriptive catalogue of vision-specific PRO instruments, to inform the choice of an appropriate measure of patient-reported outcomes in a glaucoma context.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofQuality of Life Researchen
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011. Che Hamzah, J, Burr, JM, Ramsay, CR, Azuara-Blanco, A & Prior, M 2011, 'Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments', Quality of Life Research, vol 20, no. 7, pp. 1141-1158. The final publication is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1en
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcomesen
dc.subjectPROsen
dc.subjectGlaucomaen
dc.subjectClinical trialsen
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen
dc.subjectWHO ICF frameworken
dc.subjectImpairment questionnaireen
dc.subjectVisual function questionnaireen
dc.subjectSickness Impact Profileen
dc.subjectOcular surface diseaseen
dc.subjectCataract - surgery careen
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen
dc.subjectIntraocular-pressureen
dc.subjectRasch analysisen
dc.subjectFunctioning questionnaireen
dc.subjectRE Ophthalmologyen
dc.subject.lccREen
dc.titleChoosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research : a systematic review of vision instrumentsen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record