St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research : a systematic review of vision instruments

Thumbnail
View/Open
Che_Hamzah_2011.pdf (147.9Kb)
Date
09/2011
Author
Hamzah, Jemaima Che
Burr, Jennifer Margaret
Ramsay, Craig R.
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Prior, Maria
Keywords
Patient-reported outcomes
PROs
Glaucoma
Clinical trials
Quality of life
WHO ICF framework
Impairment questionnaire
Visual function questionnaire
Sickness Impact Profile
Ocular surface disease
Cataract - surgery care
Psychometric properties
Intraocular-pressure
Rasch analysis
Functioning questionnaire
RE Ophthalmology
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
Purpose: To identify vision Patient-Reported Outcomes instruments relevant to glaucoma and assess their content validity. Methods: MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and SCOPUS (to January 2009) were systematically searched. Observational studies or randomised controlled trials, published in English, reporting use of vision instruments in glaucoma studies involving adults were included. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify additional studies describing development and/or validation to ascertain the final version of the instruments. Instruments' content was then mapped onto a theoretical framework, the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and quality assessed instrument content. Results: Thirty-three instruments were identified. Instruments were categorised into thirteen vision status, two vision disability, one vision satisfaction, five glaucoma status, one glaucoma medication related to health status, five glaucoma medication side effects and six glaucoma medication satisfaction measures according to each instruments' content. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25, Impact of Vision Impairment and Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure had the highest number of positive ratings in the content validity assessment. Conclusion: This study provides a descriptive catalogue of vision-specific PRO instruments, to inform the choice of an appropriate measure of patient-reported outcomes in a glaucoma context.
Citation
Hamzah , J C , Burr , J M , Ramsay , C R , Azuara-Blanco , A & Prior , M 2011 , ' Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research : a systematic review of vision instruments ' , Quality of Life Research , vol. 20 , no. 7 , pp. 1141-1158 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1
Publication
Quality of Life Research
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1
ISSN
0962-9343
Type
Journal item
Rights
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011. Che Hamzah, J, Burr, JM, Ramsay, CR, Azuara-Blanco, A & Prior, M 2011, 'Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments', Quality of Life Research, vol 20, no. 7, pp. 1141-1158. The final publication is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/4203

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter