The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
HEAP2LOURENCOT_.pdf208.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures
Authors: Lourenco, Tania
Grant, Adrian M.
Burr, Jennifer M.
Vale, Luke
Keywords: New interventional procedures
Medical devices
RA Public aspects of medicine
Issue Date: Mar-2012
Citation: Lourenco , T , Grant , A M , Burr , J M & Vale , L 2012 , ' A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures ' Health Policy , vol 104 , no. 3 , pp. 234-240 . , 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.11.012
Abstract: Objectives: The introduction of new interventional procedures is less regulated than for other health technologies such as pharmaceuticals. Decisions are often taken on evidence of efficacy and short-term safety from small-scale usually observational studies. This reflects the particular challenges of evaluating interventional procedures – the extra facets of skill and training and the difficulty defining a 'new‘ technology. Currently, there is no framework to evaluate new interventional procedures before they become available in clinical practice as opposed to new pharmaceuticals. This paper proposes a framework to guide the evaluation of a new interventional procedure. Proposed framework: A framework was developed consisting of a four-stage progressive evaluation for a new interventional procedure: Stage 1: Development; Stage 2: Efficacy and short-term safety; Stage 3: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; and Stage 4: Implementation. The framework also suggests the types of studies or data collection methods that can be used to satisfy each stage. Conclusions: This paper makes a first step on a framework for generating evidence on new interventional procedures. The difficulties and limitations of applying such a framework are discussed.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 0168-8510
Type: Journal article
Rights: This is an author version of this article. The published version (c) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. is available at
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Medicine Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)