Personalised lung cancer risk stratification and lung cancer screening : do general practice electronic medical records have a role?
Abstract
Background In the United Kingdom (UK), cancer screening invitations are based on general practice (GP) registrations. We hypothesize that GP electronic medical records (EMR) can be utilised to calculate a lung cancer risk score with good accuracy/clinical utility. Methods The development cohort was Secure Anonymised Information Linkage-SAIL (2.3 million GP EMR) and the validation cohort was UK Biobank-UKB (N = 211,597 with GP-EMR availability). Fast backward method was applied for variable selection and area under the curve (AUC) evaluated discrimination. Results Age 55–75 were included (SAIL: N = 574,196; UKB: N = 137,918). Six-year lung cancer incidence was 1.1% (6430) in SAIL and 0.48% (656) in UKB. The final model included 17/56 variables in SAIL for the EMR-derived score: age, sex, socioeconomic status, smoking status, family history, body mass index (BMI), BMI:smoking interaction, alcohol misuse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, dementia, hypertension, painful condition, stroke, peripheral vascular disease and history of previous cancer and previous pneumonia. The GP-EMR-derived score had AUC of 80.4% in SAIL and 74.4% in UKB and outperformed ever-smoked criteria (currently the first step in UK lung cancer screening pilots). Discussion A GP-EMR-derived score may have a role in UK lung cancer screening by accurately targeting high-risk individuals without requiring patient contact.
Citation
Jani , B D , Sullivan , M K , Hanlon , P , Nicholl , B I , Lees , J S , Brown , L , MacDonald , S , Mark , P B , Mair , F S & Sullivan , F M 2023 , ' Personalised lung cancer risk stratification and lung cancer screening : do general practice electronic medical records have a role? ' , British Journal of Cancer , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02467-9
Publication
British Journal of Cancer
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0007-0920Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Description
Dr. Bhautesh Dinesh Jani’s time was partly funded by a research grant from the British Medical Association. Chief Scientist Office (CSO, Scotland) funded SAIL data access costs (PCL/18/03). JSL was funded by CSO Postdoctoral Lectureship Award (PCL/20/10). The Medical Research Council fund MKS (MR/V001671/1) and PH (MR/S021949/1).Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.