The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 11 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
manuscript_scenes2011.pdf235.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Facebook or Fakebook? : The effects of simulated mobile applications on simulated mobile networks
Authors: Parris, Iain Siraj
Ben Abdesslem, Fehmi
Henderson, Tristan
Keywords: Simulation
Social networks
Opportunistic networks
Social-network routing
QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Issue Date: 2012
Citation: Parris , I S , Ben Abdesslem , F & Henderson , T 2012 , ' Facebook or Fakebook? : The effects of simulated mobile applications on simulated mobile networks ' Ad Hoc Networks . , 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.05.008
Abstract: The credibility of mobile ad hoc network simulations depends on accurate characterisations of user behaviour, e.g., mobility and application usage. If simulated nodes communicate at different rates to real nodes, or move in an unrealistic fashion, this may have a large impact on the network protocols being simulated and tested. Many future mobile network protocols, however, may also depend on future mobile applications. Different applications may be used at different rates or in different manners. But how can we determine realistic user behaviour for such applications that do not yet exist? One common solution is again simulation, but this time simulation of these future applications. This paper examines differences in user behaviour between a real and simulated mobile social networking application through a user study (n=80). We show that there are distinct differences in privacy behaviour between the real and simulated groups. We then simulate a mobile opportunistic network application using two real-world traces to demonstrate the impact of using real and simulated applications. We find large differences between using real and synthetic models of privacy behaviour, but smaller differences between models derived from the real and simulated applications.
Version: Postprint
Description: This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [grant number EP/G002606/1].
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 1570-8705
Type: Journal article
Rights: This is an author version of this work. The published version (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. is available at
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Computer Science Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)