Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLadd, Cai
dc.contributor.authorSmeaton, Craig
dc.contributor.authorSkov, Martin
dc.contributor.authorAustin, William
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-14T12:30:17Z
dc.date.available2022-11-14T12:30:17Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-15
dc.identifier281394974
dc.identifierd2bc3d0a-d495-4309-8a5c-2d00f9cccfe0
dc.identifier85140380378
dc.identifier.citationLadd , C , Smeaton , C , Skov , M & Austin , W 2022 , ' Best practice for upscaling soil organic carbon stocks in salt marshes   ' , Geoderma , vol. 428 , 116188 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116188en
dc.identifier.issn0016-7061
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4535-2555/work/121753900
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/26391
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant NE/R010846/1) Carbon Storage in Intertidal Environments (C-SIDE) project.en
dc.description.abstractCalculating the amount of soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in coastal environments, including salt marshes, is needed to determine their role in mitigating the Climate Crisis. Several techniques exist to calculate the SOC content of a unit of land from the upscaling of soil cores. However, no comprehensive assessment has been made on the performance of commonly used SOC upscaling techniques until now. We measured the SOC content of soil cores gathered from two Scottish salt marshes. Two SOC values were used for upscaling; SOC content for a 1 m standardised depth (as recommended by the IPCC), and SOC content of the modern marsh deposit (identified in the stratigraphy as a transition from organic-rich (marsh) to mineral-rich (intertidal flat) soil. Twenty-two upscaling techniques were used (SOC content × area, interpolative, and regression-based extrapolative calculations). Leave-one-out cross-validation procedures and prediction interval widths were used to assess the accuracy of each technique. Digital Terrain Models and Normalized Difference Vegetation Indices were used as covariate surfaces in the regression models. We found that marsh-scale SOC stocks varied by as much as fifty-two times depending on which sampling depth and upscaling technique was used. The largest differences emerged when comparing SOC stocks upscaled from 1 m deep and modern marsh deposits. Using the IPCC recommended 1 m sampling depth inflated the SOC stocks of salt marshes, as intertidal flat environments were included in the calculation. Ensemble regression models from the weighted average of seven machine learning algorithm outputs produced the highest upscaling accuracies across marshes and sampling depths. Simple SOC content × area calculations produced marsh-scale SOC stocks that were comparable to stock values produced by more advanced ensemble regression models. However, regression models produced detailed maps of SOC distribution across a marsh, and the associated uncertainty in the SOC values. Our findings are broadly applicable for other environments where large-scale SOC stock assessments and uncertainty are needed.
dc.format.extent15
dc.format.extent14607296
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGeodermaen
dc.subjectSaltmarshen
dc.subjectSalt marshesen
dc.subjectUpscalingen
dc.subjectSoil coringen
dc.subjectPedometric mappingen
dc.subjectScotlanden
dc.subjectOrganic carbonen
dc.subjectSoil organic carbonen
dc.subjectGeostatisticsen
dc.subjectSoilen
dc.subjectCoastalen
dc.subjectIntertidalen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQ Science (General)en
dc.subjectEarth-Surface Processesen
dc.subjectGeneral Environmental Scienceen
dc.subjectEcological Modellingen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectSDG 13 - Climate Actionen
dc.subjectSDG 14 - Life Below Wateren
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQ1en
dc.titleBest practice for upscaling soil organic carbon stocks in salt marshes  en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorNERCen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Environmental Change Research Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Coastal Resources Management Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116188
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/R010846/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record