Files in this item
Lesser-evil justifications : a reply to Frowe
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Gordon-Solmon, Kerah | |
dc.contributor.author | Pummer, Theron Gene | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T08:30:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T08:30:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gordon-Solmon , K & Pummer , T G 2022 , ' Lesser-evil justifications : a reply to Frowe ' , Law and Philosophy , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-022-09454-w | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-5249 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 278011756 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: febceded-a121-467f-9bb8-ea0995a90fb5 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-0147-9917/work/116910328 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85135585995 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000836154400001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/25769 | |
dc.description | For funding, Kerah Gordon-Solmon is grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Sometimes one can prevent harm only by contravening rights. If the harm one can prevent is great enough, compared to the stringency of the opposing rights, then one has a lesser-evil justification to contravene the rights. Non-consequentialist orthodoxy holds that, most of the time, lesser-evil justifications add to agents’ permissible options without taking any away. Helen Frowe rejects this view. She claims that, almost always, agents must act on their lesser-evil justifications. Our primary task is to refute Frowe’s flagship argument. Secondarily, it is to sketch a positive case for nonconsequentialist orthodoxy. | |
dc.format.extent | 8 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Law and Philosophy | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © The Author(s). This article is an open access publication 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en |
dc.subject | Lesser-Evil Justifications | en |
dc.subject | Helen Frowe | en |
dc.subject | B Philosophy (General) | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | B1 | en |
dc.title | Lesser-evil justifications : a reply to Frowe | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Energy Ethics | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for the Study of Philanthropy & Public Good | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Philosophy | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-022-09454-w | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.embargoedUntil | 2022-08-04 | |
dc.identifier.url | https://philpapers.org/rec/GORLJA | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.