Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRussell, Gillian
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T11:30:06Z
dc.date.available2021-11-29T11:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-24
dc.identifier.citationRussell , G 2021 , ' How to prove Hume’s Law ' , Journal of Philosophical Logic , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3en
dc.identifier.issn1573-0433
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 276831076
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e5bf404e-da15-4b49-ad40-f5bdab1018a9
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:95BFDB4499CF33817ABC8D15E52D9FBE
dc.identifier.otherRIS: Russell2021
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85119861880
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000721639500001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/24418
dc.description.abstractThis paper proves a precisification of Hume’s Law—the thesis that one cannot get an ought from an is—as an instance of a more general theorem which establishes several other philosophically interesting, though less controversial, barriers to logical consequence.
dc.format.extent30
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Philosophical Logicen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.en
dc.subjectHume’s Lawen
dc.subjectBarriers to entailmenten
dc.subjectPhilosophical logicen
dc.subjectInvalidityen
dc.subjectLogical consequenceen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleHow to prove Hume’s Lawen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record