How to prove Hume’s Law

Russell, Gillian

Show simple item record

Files in this item

Name:: Russell_2021_JoPL_HowToProveHumesLaw_CC.pdf
Size:: 821.6Kb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

Item metadata

dc.contributor.author	Russell, Gillian
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-29T11:30:06Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-29T11:30:06Z
dc.date.issued	2021-11-24
dc.identifier	276831076
dc.identifier	e5bf404e-da15-4b49-ad40-f5bdab1018a9
dc.identifier	85119861880
dc.identifier	000721639500001
dc.identifier.citation	Russell , G 2021 , ' How to prove Hume’s Law ' , Journal of Philosophical Logic , vol. First Online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3	en
dc.identifier.issn	1573-0433
dc.identifier.other	RIS: urn:95BFDB4499CF33817ABC8D15E52D9FBE
dc.identifier.other	RIS: Russell2021
dc.identifier.other	ORCID: /0000-0001-6423-0655/work/164894557
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10023/24418
dc.description.abstract	This paper proves a precisification of Hume’s Law—the thesis that one cannot get an ought from an is—as an instance of a more general theorem which establishes several other philosophically interesting, though less controversial, barriers to logical consequence.
dc.format.extent	30
dc.format.extent	841328
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Philosophical Logic	en
dc.subject	Hume’s Law	en
dc.subject	Barriers to entailment	en
dc.subject	Philosophical logic	en
dc.subject	Invalidity	en
dc.subject	Logical consequence	en
dc.subject	B Philosophy (General)	en
dc.subject	T-NDAS	en
dc.subject.lcc	B1	en
dc.title	How to prove Hume’s Law	en
dc.type	Journal article	en
dc.contributor.institution	University of St Andrews. Philosophy	en
dc.contributor.institution	University of St Andrews. Arché Philosophical Research Centre for Logic, Language, Metaphysics and Epistemology	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3
dc.description.status	Peer reviewed	en

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

University of St Andrews Research

Show simple item record