St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data : an example using eBird data to estimate species distributions

Thumbnail
View/Open
Johnston_2021_DD_Analytical_guidelines_increase_CC.pdf (1.613Mb)
Date
07/2021
Author
Johnston, Alison
Hochachka, Wesley M.
Strimas-Mackey, Matthew E.
Ruiz Gutierrez, Viviana
Robinson, Orin J.
Miller, Eliot T.
Auer, Tom
Kelling, Steve T.
Fink, Daniel
Keywords
Citizen science
Community science
Detectability
eBird
Encounter rate
Occupancy model
Species distribution model
DAS
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
Aim Ecological data collected by the general public are valuable for addressing a wide range of ecological research and conservation planning, and there has been a rapid increase in the scope and volume of data available. However, data from eBird or other large-scale projects with volunteer observers typically present several challenges that can impede robust ecological inferences. These challenges include spatial bias, variation in effort and species reporting bias. Innovation We use the example of estimating species distributions with data from eBird, a community science or citizen science (CS) project. We estimate two widely used metrics of species distributions: encounter rate and occupancy probability. For each metric, we critically assess the impact of data processing steps that either degrade or refine the data used in the analyses. CS data density varies widely across the globe, so we also test whether differences in model performance are robust to sample size. Main conclusions Model performance improved when data processing and analytical methods addressed the challenges arising from CS data; however, the degree of improvement varied with species and data density. The largest gains we observed in model performance were achieved with 1) the use of complete checklists (where observers report all the species they detect and identify, allowing non-detections to be inferred) and 2) the use of covariates describing variation in effort and detectability for each checklist. Occupancy models were more robust to a lack of complete checklists. Improvements in model performance with data refinement were more evident with larger sample sizes. In general, we found that the value of each refinement varied by situation and we encourage researchers to assess the benefits in other scenarios. These approaches will enable researchers to more effectively harness the vast ecological knowledge that exists within CS data for conservation and basic research.
Citation
Johnston , A , Hochachka , W M , Strimas-Mackey , M E , Ruiz Gutierrez , V , Robinson , O J , Miller , E T , Auer , T , Kelling , S T & Fink , D 2021 , ' Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data : an example using eBird data to estimate species distributions ' , Diversity and Distributions , vol. 27 , no. 7 , pp. 1265-1277 . https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13271
Publication
Diversity and Distributions
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13271
ISSN
1366-9516
Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Description
Funding: Wolf Creek Foundation; National Science Foundation. Grant Numbers: CCF-1522054, CNS-1059284, DBI-1939187, ICER-1927646; National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Grant Number: NNH12ZDA001N-ECOF; Leon Levy Foundation.
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/24396

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter