Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMiller, David L.
dc.contributor.authorFifield, David
dc.contributor.authorWakefield, Ewan
dc.contributor.authorSigourney, Douglas B.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T12:30:02Z
dc.date.available2021-09-03T12:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-02
dc.identifier.citationMiller , D L , Fifield , D , Wakefield , E & Sigourney , D B 2021 , ' Extending density surface models to include multiple and double-observer survey data ' , PeerJ , vol. 9 , e12113 . https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12113en
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 275720029
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ead0cc7c-5b96-4f0c-9367-5b71ffbce1bd
dc.identifier.othercrossref: 10.7717/peerj.12113
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85114382938
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/23895
dc.descriptionDavid L. Miller was funded by OPNAV N45 and the SURTASS LFA Settlement Agreement, being managed by the U.S. Navy’s Living Marine Resources program under Contract No. N39430-17-C-1982, collaboration between Douglas B. Sigourney and David L. Miller was also facilitated by the DenMod working group (https://synergy.st-andrews.ac.uk/denmod/) funded under the same agreement. The survey that the fin whale data originate from was funded through two inter-agency agreements with the National Marine Fisheries Service: inter-agency agreement number M14PG00005 with the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC and inter-agency agreement number NEC-16-011-01-FY18 with the US Navy. The survey that the fulmar data originate from was funded by the UK Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) grant NE/M017990/1.en
dc.description.abstractSpatial models of density and abundance are widely used in both ecological research (e.g., to study habitat use) and wildlife management (e.g., for population monitoring and environmental impact assessment). Increasingly, modellers are tasked with integrating data from multiple sources, collected via different observation processes. Distance sampling is an efficient and widely used survey and analysis technique. Within this framework, observation processes are modelled via detection functions. We seek to take multiple data sources and fit them in a single spatial model. Density surface models (DSMs) are a two-stage approach: first accounting for detectability via distance sampling methods, then modelling distribution via a generalized additive model. However, current software and theory does not address the issue of multiple data sources. We extend the DSM approach to accommodate data from multiple surveys, collected via conventional distance sampling, double-observer distance sampling (used to account for incomplete detection at zero distance) and strip transects. Variance propagation ensures that uncertainty is correctly accounted for in final estimates of abundance. Methods described here are implemented in the dsm R package. We briefly analyse two datasets to illustrate these new developments. Our new methodology enables data from multiple distance sampling surveys of different types to be treated in a single spatial model, enabling more robust abundance estimation, potentially over wider geographical or temporal domains.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJen
dc.rightsThis is an open access article, free of all copyright, made available under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication. This work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.en
dc.subjectDensity surface modelen
dc.subjectDistance samplingen
dc.subjectGeneralized additive modelen
dc.subjectSpatial modellingen
dc.subjectVariance propagationen
dc.subjectAbundance estimationen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectHA Statisticsen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccHAen
dc.titleExtending density surface models to include multiple and double-observer survey dataen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12113
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://peerj.com/articles/12113/#supplementary-materialen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record