Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRostron, Claire L.
dc.contributor.authorFarquhar, Morag J.
dc.contributor.authorLatimer, Mary P.
dc.contributor.authorWinn, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T13:01:04Z
dc.date.available2012-02-16T13:01:04Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-30
dc.identifier.citationRostron , C L , Farquhar , M J , Latimer , M P & Winn , P 2008 , ' The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis : Do both have a role in sustained attention? ' , BioMed Central Neuroscience , vol. 9 , 16 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2202
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 620790
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ad1c8b99-6b5f-49fc-ab13-e4823108438b
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000253537100001
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 39849086800
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/2320
dc.descriptionAdditional 'open data' files can be found on the publisher's site at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/16 This work was supported by UK BBSRC project grant no. 49/S18381 to PW.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. Results: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. Conclusion: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss.
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBioMed Central Neuroscienceen
dc.rights© 2008 Rostron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden
dc.subjectLateral geniculate-nucleusen
dc.subjectReaction-time-task-TASKen
dc.subjectCholinergic modulationen
dc.subjectExcitotoxic lesionsen
dc.subjectNADPH-diaphoraseen
dc.subjectVisual-attentionen
dc.subjectRaten
dc.subjectForebrainen
dc.subjectPerformanceen
dc.subjectThalmusen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titleThe pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis : Do both have a role in sustained attention?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39849086800&partnerID=8YFLogxKen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record