St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis : Do both have a role in sustained attention?

Thumbnail
View/Open
BMCNeuroscience2008_9_16.pdf (961.0Kb)
Date
30/01/2008
Author
Rostron, Claire L.
Farquhar, Morag J.
Latimer, Mary P.
Winn, Philip
Keywords
Lateral geniculate-nucleus
Reaction-time-task-TASK
Cholinergic modulation
Excitotoxic lesions
NADPH-diaphorase
Visual-attention
Rat
Forebrain
Performance
Thalmus
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background: It is well established that nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NbM) lesions impair performance on tests of sustained attention. Previous work from this laboratory has also demonstrated that pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) lesioned rats make more omissions on a test of sustained attention, suggesting that it might also play a role in mediating this function. However, the results of the PPTg study were open to alternative interpretation. We aimed to resolve this by conducting a detailed analysis of the effects of damage to each brain region in the same sustained attention task used in our previous work. Rats were trained in the task before surgery and post-surgical testing examined performance in response to unpredictable light signals of 1500 ms and 4000 ms duration. Data for PPTg lesioned rats were compared to control rats, and rats with 192 IgG saporin infusions centred on the NbM. In addition to operant data, video data of rats' performance during the task were also analysed. Results: Both lesion groups omitted trials relative to controls but the effect was milder and transient in NbM rats. The number of omitted trials decreased in all groups when tested using the 4000 ms signal compared to the 1500 ms signal. This confirmed previous findings for PPTg lesioned rats. Detailed analysis revealed that the increase in omissions in PPTg rats was not a consequence of motor impairment. The video data (taken on selected days) showed reduced lever orientation in PPTg lesioned rats, coupled with an increase in unconditioned behaviours such as rearing and sniffing. In contrast NbM rats showed evidence of inadequate lever pressing. Conclusion: The question addressed here is whether the PPTg and NbM both have a role in sustained attention. Rats bearing lesions of either structure showed deficits in the test used. However, we conclude that the most parsimonious explanation for the deficit observed in PPTg rats is inadequate response organization, rather than impairment in sustained attention. Furthermore the impairment observed in NbM lesioned rats included lever pressing difficulties in addition to impaired sustained attention. Unfortunately we could not link these deficits directly to cholinergic neuronal loss.
Citation
Rostron , C L , Farquhar , M J , Latimer , M P & Winn , P 2008 , ' The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis : Do both have a role in sustained attention? ' , BioMed Central Neuroscience , vol. 9 , 16 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16
Publication
BioMed Central Neuroscience
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-16
ISSN
1471-2202
Type
Journal article
Rights
© 2008 Rostron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Description
Additional 'open data' files can be found on the publisher's site at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/16 This work was supported by UK BBSRC project grant no. 49/S18381 to PW.
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URL
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39849086800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2320

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter