Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBlackburn, Emma
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Benedictus
dc.contributor.authorRiseley, Alice
dc.contributor.authorAzang, Arin
dc.contributor.authorIvande, Samuel Tertese
dc.contributor.authorHewson, Chris
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, Will
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-07T15:54:40Z
dc.date.available2020-12-07T15:54:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier262531152
dc.identifier3daef6db-0530-4f80-865c-ed6597f4d595
dc.identifier85075712527
dc.identifier000499076800001
dc.identifier.citationBlackburn , E , Burgess , M , Freeman , B , Riseley , A , Azang , A , Ivande , S T , Hewson , C & Cresswell , W 2019 , ' Light stalks increase the precision and accuracy of non-breeding locations calculated from geolocator tags : a field test from a long-distance migrant ' , Bird Study , vol. 66 , no. 3 , pp. 353-365 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2019.1690421en
dc.identifier.issn0006-3657
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4684-7624/work/65345233
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/21071
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the Chris Goodwin, A.P. Leventis Conservation Foundation, AP Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, the British Ornithologists’ Union and the Linnean Society.en
dc.description.abstractCapsule: There is a substantial gain in precision and accuracy of geolocator locations when using a light stalk. Aims: Light stalks or tubes increase the accuracy of geolocators when tracking migrant birds because they reduce potential shading of the light sensor by feathers but may increase detrimental tag effects. We aimed to determine how adding light stalks to geolocator tags increased accuracy and precision of locations. Methods: We quantified how precision and accuracy of geolocator locations was affected by comparing variation of sunrise and sunset times from tags with variable length light stalks (6 of 0 mm, 8 of 5 mm and 21 of 10 mm). Tags were fitted to Whinchats Saxicola rubetra in central Nigeria (the known location to compare accuracy), and variance in latitude and longitude of geolocator estimated locations were also compared across light stalk lengths during spring migration stationary locations, and at breeding sites in Eastern Europe, for both Geolight and FlightR methods. Results: Without a light stalk, the standard deviation of sunset and sunrise times increased by 50% and 100% respectively (i.e. less precise): confidence intervals for latitude were larger by about 4.3 degrees at non-breeding low latitudes and 1.8 degrees at stop-over latitudes, or confidence intervals for longitude were larger by 2.3 degrees, dependent on analysis method. Estimated sun elevation angles were significantly less accurate and so calculated non-breeding locations were significantly less accurate by about 8 degrees of latitude. Precision in sunrise, sunset times, latitude and longitude, was similar when using a 5mm or 10mm stalk. Conclusions: The results show a substantial gain in precision and accuracy of low latitude geolocator locations when using a light stalk that brings the sensor above covering feathers. There is no advantage from longer light stalk lengths than those necessary to just expose the light sensor above the feathers, at least for small passerines.
dc.format.extent1175772
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBird Studyen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleLight stalks increase the precision and accuracy of non-breeding locations calculated from geolocator tags : a field test from a long-distance migranten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00063657.2019.1690421
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-11-28


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record