St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Register / Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Light stalks increase the precision and accuracy of non-breeding locations calculated from geolocator tags : a field test from a long-distance migrant

Thumbnail
View/Open
Blackburn_2019_Light_stalk_effects_Bird_Study_AAM.pdf (1.121Mb)
Date
2019
Author
Blackburn, Emma
Burgess, Malcolm
Freeman, Benedictus
Riseley, Alice
Azang, Arin
Ivande, Samuel Tertese
Hewson, Chris
Cresswell, Will
Keywords
QH301 Biology
DAS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Capsule: There is a substantial gain in precision and accuracy of geolocator locations when using a light stalk. Aims: Light stalks or tubes increase the accuracy of geolocators when tracking migrant birds because they reduce potential shading of the light sensor by feathers but may increase detrimental tag effects. We aimed to determine how adding light stalks to geolocator tags increased accuracy and precision of locations. Methods: We quantified how precision and accuracy of geolocator locations was affected by comparing variation of sunrise and sunset times from tags with variable length light stalks (6 of 0 mm, 8 of 5 mm and 21 of 10 mm). Tags were fitted to Whinchats Saxicola rubetra in central Nigeria (the known location to compare accuracy), and variance in latitude and longitude of geolocator estimated locations were also compared across light stalk lengths during spring migration stationary locations, and at breeding sites in Eastern Europe, for both Geolight and FlightR methods. Results: Without a light stalk, the standard deviation of sunset and sunrise times increased by 50% and 100% respectively (i.e. less precise): confidence intervals for latitude were larger by about 4.3 degrees at non-breeding low latitudes and 1.8 degrees at stop-over latitudes, or confidence intervals for longitude were larger by 2.3 degrees, dependent on analysis method. Estimated sun elevation angles were significantly less accurate and so calculated non-breeding locations were significantly less accurate by about 8 degrees of latitude. Precision in sunrise, sunset times, latitude and longitude, was similar when using a 5mm or 10mm stalk. Conclusions: The results show a substantial gain in precision and accuracy of low latitude geolocator locations when using a light stalk that brings the sensor above covering feathers. There is no advantage from longer light stalk lengths than those necessary to just expose the light sensor above the feathers, at least for small passerines.
Citation
Blackburn , E , Burgess , M , Freeman , B , Riseley , A , Azang , A , Ivande , S T , Hewson , C & Cresswell , W 2019 , ' Light stalks increase the precision and accuracy of non-breeding locations calculated from geolocator tags : a field test from a long-distance migrant ' , Bird Study , vol. 66 , no. 3 , pp. 353-365 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2019.1690421
Publication
Bird Study
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2019.1690421
ISSN
0006-3657
Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright © 2019 British Trust for Ornithology. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the author created accepted manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2019.1690421
Description
This work was supported by the Chris Goodwin, A.P. Leventis Conservation Foundation, AP Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, the British Ornithologists’ Union and the Linnean Society.
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/21071

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter