Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMullins, Ryan T.
dc.identifier.citationMullins , R T 2020 , ' Trinity, subordination, and heresy : a reply to Mark Edwards ' , Theologica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology , vol. 4 , no. 2 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 266584638
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d28eb8a6-1d53-4dcd-8c25-d8a50399a2e4
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:E8208E52F47AE6A3ADF567D7B85D79FB
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85091114847
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father.
dc.relation.ispartofTheologica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theologyen
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 R. T. Mullins. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.en
dc.subjectEternal generationen
dc.subjectAnalytic theologyen
dc.subjectBL Religionen
dc.titleTrinity, subordination, and heresy : a reply to Mark Edwardsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Divinityen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record