Trinity, subordination, and heresy : a reply to Mark Edwards
MetadataShow full item record
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father.
Mullins , R T 2020 , ' Trinity, subordination, and heresy : a reply to Mark Edwards ' , TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology , vol. 4 , no. 2 . https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323
TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology
Copyright (c) 2020 R. T. Mullins. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.