Trinity, subordination, and heresy : a reply to Mark Edwards
Date
10/02/2020Author
Metadata
Show full item recordAltmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
In this article, I offer some analytic reflections on Mark Edward's paper, "Is Subordinationism a Heresy?" I shall discuss the desiderata for a conciliar Trinitarian theology, the divine essence, and the different notions of subordination that Edwards identifies. Then I shall consider two arguments that certain accepted, conciliar notions of subordination lead to heretical notions of subordination. Thus raising the worry that conciliar Trinitarian theology might involve some internal incoherence between the homoousios doctrine and the subordination of the Son and Holy Spirit to the Father.
Citation
Mullins , R T 2020 , ' Trinity, subordination, and heresy : a reply to Mark Edwards ' , TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology , vol. 4 , no. 2 . https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v4i2.52323
Publication
TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2593-0265Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright (c) 2020 R. T. Mullins. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.