The will not to believe
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Is it permissible to believe that God does not exist if the evidence is inconclusive? In this paper, we give a new argument in support of atheistic belief modelled on William James’s The Will to Believe. According to James, if the evidence for a proposition, p, is ambiguous, and believing that p is a genuine option, then it can be permissible to let your passions decide. Typically, James’s argument has been used as a defence of passionally caused theistic belief. However, in the existing literature, little attention has been given to topic of passionally caused atheistic belief. Here, we give much needed attention to the issue of how areligious passions can justify atheistic belief. Following James, we argue that if atheism is a genuine option for an agent, it is permissible to believe that God does not exist based on her hopes, desires, wishes, or whatever passions incline her to disbelieve. After defending the coherence of passionally caused atheism, we go on to suggest why this position is a tenable one for the atheist to adopt.
Cockayne , J & Warman , J 2019 , ' The will not to believe ' , Sophia , vol. 58 , no. 3 , pp. 511-523 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-018-0689-y
© Springer Nature B.V. 2018. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-018-0689-y
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.