Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorReinaud, Jean Noel
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-21T23:41:27Z
dc.date.available2019-07-21T23:41:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-25
dc.identifier.citationReinaud , J N 2019 , ' Three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic vortex equilibria with m −fold symmetry ' , Journal of Fluid Mechanics , vol. 863 , pp. 32-59 . https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.989en
dc.identifier.issn0022-1120
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 256808985
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3bcd77af-8d64-4655-b942-3c90b9e0bb53
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5449-6628/work/53214494
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85060399266
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000458501600001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/18144
dc.description.abstractWe investigate arrays of m three-dimensional, unit-Burger-number, quasi-geostrophic vortices in mutual equilibrium whose centroids lie on a horizontal circular ring; or m + 1 vortices where the additional vortex lies on the vertical ‘central’ axis passing through the centre of the array. We first analyse the linear stability of circular point vortex arrays. Three distinct categories of vortex arrays are considered. In the first category, the m identical point vortices are equally spaced on a circular ring and no vortex is located on the vertical central axis. In the other two categories, a ‘central’ vortex is added. The latter two categories differ by the sign of the central vortex. We next turn our attention to finite volume vortices for the same three categories. The vortices consist of finite volumes of uniform potential vorticity and the equilibrium vortex arrays have an (imposed) m−fold symmetry. For simplicity all vortices have the same volume and the same potential vorticity, in absolute value. For such finite volume vortex arrays, we determine families of equilibria which are spanned by the ratio of a distance separating the vortices and the array centre to the vortices' mean radius. We determine numerically the shape of the equilibria for m = 2 up to m = 7, for each three categories, and we address their linear stability. For the m−vortex circular arrays, all configurations with m ≥ 6 are unstable. Point vortex arrays are linearly stable for m < 6. Finite-volume vortices may, however, be sensitive to instabilities deforming the vortices for m < 6 if the ratio of the distance separating the vortices to their mean radius is smaller than a threshold depending on m. Adding a vortex on the central axis modifies the overall stability properties of the vortex arrays. For m = 2, a central vortex tends to destabilise the vortex array unless the central vortex has opposite sign and is intense. For m > 2, the unstable regime can be obtained if the strength of the central vortex is larger in magnitude than a threshold depending on the number of vortices. This is true whether the central vortex has the same sign as or the opposite sign to the peripheral vortices. A moderate strength like-signed central vortex tends, however, to stabilise the vortex array when located near the plane containing the array. On the contrary, most of the vortex arrays with an opposite-signed central vortex are unstable.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Fluid Mechanicsen
dc.rights© 2019, Cambridge University Press. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.989en
dc.subjectQuasi-geostrophic flowsen
dc.subjectVortex instabilityen
dc.subjectVortex interactionsen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectQC Physicsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQCen
dc.titleThree-dimensional quasi-geostrophic vortex equilibria with m−fold symmetryen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Applied Mathematicsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.989
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2020-01-19


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record