Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGlonti, Ketevan
dc.contributor.authorStruckmann, Verena
dc.contributor.authorAlconada, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorPettigrew, Luisa M.
dc.contributor.authorHernandez-Santiago, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorMinue, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorRisso-Gill, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Martin
dc.contributor.authorLegido-Quigley, Helena
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-19T14:30:05Z
dc.date.available2019-03-19T14:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier256156371
dc.identifier7ba8109b-d0bd-4e5f-8314-584021dbd848
dc.identifier85044329408
dc.identifier.citationGlonti , K , Struckmann , V , Alconada , A , Pettigrew , L M , Hernandez-Santiago , V , Minue , S , Risso-Gill , I , McKee , M & Legido-Quigley , H 2019 , ' Exploring the training and scope of practice of GPs in England, Germany and Spain ' , Gaceta Sanitaria , vol. 33 , no. 2 , pp. 148-155 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.011en
dc.identifier.issn0213-9111
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8544-1483/work/71560028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17314
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the European Union 7th Framework Programme EU Cross Border Care Collaboration (EUCBCC). Contract no: 242058.en
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore general practitioner (GP) training, continuing professional development, scope of practice, ethical issues and challenges in the working environment in three European countries. Method: Qualitative study of 35 GPs from England, Germany and Spain working in urban primary care practices. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling techniques. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed by four independent researchers adopting a thematic approach. Results: Entrance to and length of GP training differ between the three countries, while continuing professional development is required in all three, although with different characteristics. Key variations in the scope of practice include whether there is a gatekeeping role, whether GPs work in multidisciplinary teams or singlehandedly, the existence of appraisal processes, and the balance between administrative and clinical tasks. However, similar challenges, including the need to adapt to an ageing population, end-of-life care, ethical dilemmas, the impact of austerity measures, limited time for patients and gaps in coordination between primary and secondary care are experienced by GPs in all three countries. Conclusion: Primary health care variations have strong historical roots, derived from the different national experiences and the range of clinical services delivered by GPs. There is a need for an accessible source of information for GPs themselves and those responsible for safety and quality standards of the healthcare workforce. This paper maps out the current situation before Brexit is being implemented in the UK which could see many of the current EU arrangements and legislation to assure professional mobility between the UK and the rest of Europe dismantled.
dc.format.extent344830
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGaceta Sanitariaen
dc.subjectGeneral practiceen
dc.subjectGeneral practitionersen
dc.subjectQualitative researchen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Healthen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleExploring the training and scope of practice of GPs in England, Germany and Spainen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.011
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record