Survival rights for children : what are the national and global barriers?
MetadataShow full item record
Most children die in low and middle-income countries as a result of structural injustice, and while it may not be possible to prove causality between economic policies and breaches of rights, it is possible to audit policy and practices through the lens of human rights. Child health advocates need to highlight the fact that technical interventions, in the absence of action on structural injustice, cannot address the fundamental causes of poor health. It could even be said that we collude in the fallacy that injustices can be solved with technical solutions. The determinants of health, water, food, shelter, primary education and health care are minimum core human rights, are the rights required for survival and today should be available to every child (and their families) in all countries. However, there are national and global limitations on the ability of countries to determine policy and generate the revenue required for core human rights. The authors conducted a review of the literature on the main leakages from government revenues in low and middle-income countries to identify obstacles to children enjoying their right to survival. Based on the review the authors suggest a framework for an upstream audit that can be carried out, country by country, to identify barriers in terms of policies and the generation, allocation and utilisation of revenues. This audit involves systematically screening the policies and practices of the main actors: national governments, high-income country partners, multinational enterprises, and international organisations, for possible influence on the realisation of human rights. Human rights advocates and child health associations could lead or commission an upstream audit on behalf of children in their countries in order to identify the fundamental causes and real remedies.
O'Hare , B A-M , Mfutso Bengo , E M , Devakumar , D & Mfutso Bengo , J 2018 , ' Survival rights for children : what are the national and global barriers? ' , African Human Rights Law Journal , vol. 18 , no. 2 , pp. 508-526 . https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2018/v18n2a4
African Human Rights Law Journal
Copyright 2018 the Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism Miles, David Jonathan (University of St Andrews, 2017-06-20) - ThesisThis thesis examines how American and German constitutionalism, as shaped by the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), have mediated the tension between threats to stability and ...
Ho, Kin Ting (University of St Andrews, 2014-12-01) - ThesisThis thesis explores the normative significance of making a rights-backed, authorized demand as a right holder. Rights, I argue, enable their holders to make a special kind of demand which comes with a special force. It ...
Tomalty, Jesse (University of St Andrews, 2012-06) - ThesisThe central question I address is whether the inclusion of a right to subsistence among human rights can be justified. The human right to subsistence is conventionally interpreted as a fundamental right to a basic living ...