Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Akira R.
dc.contributor.authorHan, Sanghoon
dc.contributor.authorDobbins, Ian G.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-16T16:30:15Z
dc.date.available2010-12-16T16:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-24
dc.identifier.citationO'Connor , A R , Han , S & Dobbins , I G 2010 , ' The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory : expectancy violation or successful retrieval? ' The Journal of Neuroscience , vol. 30 , no. 8 , pp. 2924-2934 . https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4225-09.2010en
dc.identifier.issn0270-6474
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 4846655
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: bb7db40f-b27d-4fe8-8c51-672cf6a5521a
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000274930500014
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 77649128654
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7943-5183/work/34028977
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/1637
dc.description.abstractFunctional neuroimaging studies of episodic recognition demonstrate an increased lateral parietal response for studied versus new materials, often termed a retrieval success effect. Using a novel memory analog of attentional cueing, we manipulated the correspondence between anticipated and actual recognition evidence by presenting valid or invalid anticipatory cues (e. g., "likely old") before recognition judgments. Although a superior parietal region demonstrated the retrieval success pattern, a larger inferior parietal lobule (IPL) region tracked the validity of the memory cueing (invalid cueing > valid cueing) and no retrieval success-sensitive lateral parietal region was insensitive to cueing. The invalid cueing response occurred even for correctly identified new items unlikely to trigger substantive episodic retrieval. Within the IPL, although supramarginal and angular gyrus (SMG; AG) regions both demonstrated invalid cueing amplitude elevations, each region differentially coupled with distinct cortical networks when unexpectedly old items were encountered; a connectivity pattern also observed at rest in the same subjects. These findings jointly suggest that the lateral parietal response during recognition does not signify the recovery of episodic content, but is a marker of the violation of memory expectations. A second independent dataset confirmed this interpretation by demonstrating that SMG activation tracked the decision biases of observers, not their accuracy, with increased activation for nondominant recognition judgments. The expectancy violation interpretation of the lateral parietal recognition response is consistent with the literature on visual search and oddball paradigms and suggests that damage to these regions should impair memory-linked orienting behavior and not retrieval per se.
dc.format.extent11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Neuroscienceen
dc.rights(c)2010 the authors. This article is available to copy, distribute, or display under a Creative Commons licence as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en
dc.subjectHuman prefrontal cortexen
dc.subjectEvent-related FMRIen
dc.subjectEpisodic retrievalen
dc.subjectFrontpolar cortexen
dc.subjectCognitive controlen
dc.subjectOddball tasksen
dc.subjectRecollectionen
dc.subjectFamiliarityen
dc.subjectAttentionen
dc.subjectBrainen
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titleThe inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory : expectancy violation or successful retrieval?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4225-09.2010
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record