The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 3 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
O_Connor_et_al_2010_JoN_IPL_Expectation.pdf2.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory : expectancy violation or successful retrieval?
Authors: O'Connor, Akira R.
Han, Sanghoon
Dobbins, Ian G.
Keywords: Human prefrontal cortex
Event-related FMRI
Episodic retrieval
Frontpolar cortex
Cognitive control
Oddball tasks
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Issue Date: 24-Feb-2010
Citation: O'Connor , A R , Han , S & Dobbins , I G 2010 , ' The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory : expectancy violation or successful retrieval? ' The Journal of Neuroscience , vol 30 , no. 8 , pp. 2924-2934 . , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4225-09.2010
Abstract: Functional neuroimaging studies of episodic recognition demonstrate an increased lateral parietal response for studied versus new materials, often termed a retrieval success effect. Using a novel memory analog of attentional cueing, we manipulated the correspondence between anticipated and actual recognition evidence by presenting valid or invalid anticipatory cues (e. g., "likely old") before recognition judgments. Although a superior parietal region demonstrated the retrieval success pattern, a larger inferior parietal lobule (IPL) region tracked the validity of the memory cueing (invalid cueing > valid cueing) and no retrieval success-sensitive lateral parietal region was insensitive to cueing. The invalid cueing response occurred even for correctly identified new items unlikely to trigger substantive episodic retrieval. Within the IPL, although supramarginal and angular gyrus (SMG; AG) regions both demonstrated invalid cueing amplitude elevations, each region differentially coupled with distinct cortical networks when unexpectedly old items were encountered; a connectivity pattern also observed at rest in the same subjects. These findings jointly suggest that the lateral parietal response during recognition does not signify the recovery of episodic content, but is a marker of the violation of memory expectations. A second independent dataset confirmed this interpretation by demonstrating that SMG activation tracked the decision biases of observers, not their accuracy, with increased activation for nondominant recognition judgments. The expectancy violation interpretation of the lateral parietal recognition response is consistent with the literature on visual search and oddball paradigms and suggests that damage to these regions should impair memory-linked orienting behavior and not retrieval per se.
Version: Publisher PDF
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 0270-6474
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c)2010 the authors. This article is available to copy, distribute, or display under a Creative Commons licence as described at
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Psychology & Neuroscience Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)