Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSkjoensberg, Max Simon
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T10:30:05Z
dc.date.available2018-10-25T10:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-04
dc.identifier.citationSkjoensberg , M S 2018 , ' Hume and Smith studies after Forbes and Trevor-Roper ' , European Journal of Political Theory , vol. Online First . https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885118798928en
dc.identifier.issn1474-8851
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 255867610
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 453843e4-ebb6-4bbc-bc96-e7723d977406
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85058473424
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000560914700010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16322
dc.description.abstractThe ‘Scottish Enlightenment’ has fostered a steadily growing academic industry since Duncan Forbes and Hugh Trevor-Roper put the subject on the map in the 1960s. David Hume and Adam Smith have from the start been widely considered as its leading thinkers, and their thoughts on politics have attracted an increasing amount of attention in recent years. Two new publications invite readers to reflect on the state of the art in Scottish Enlightenment studies in general, and especially Hume and Smith scholarship. Christopher Berry’s Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment collects many of Berry’s pathbreaking essays from a career spanning over 40 years. The Infidel and the Professor by Dennis Rasmussen is astonishingly the first book-length treatment of the private and philosophical friendship between Hume and Smith. Both publications reflect how much Scottish Enlightenment studies have expanded since the 1960s, and the sustained interest in Hume and Smith to boot. At the same time, they also raise questions about the future of the field and what remains to be done.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Political Theoryen
dc.rights© 2018 the Author. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885118798928en
dc.subjectAdam Smithen
dc.subjectCommercial societyen
dc.subjectConservatismen
dc.subjectDavid Humeen
dc.subjectLiberalismen
dc.subjectScepticismen
dc.subjectScottish Enlightenmenten
dc.subjectDA Great Britainen
dc.subjectJC Political theoryen
dc.subject.lccDAen
dc.subject.lccJCen
dc.titleHume and Smith studies after Forbes and Trevor-Roperen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1474885118798928
dc.description.statusNon peer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record