Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSigwart, Julia
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Mark D.
dc.contributor.authorBennett, K. D.
dc.identifier.citationSigwart , J , Sutton , M D & Bennett , K D 2018 , ' How big is a genus? Towards a nomothetic systematics ' , Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , vol. 183 , no. 2 , pp. 237-252 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251387663
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 6d86ca1e-28bd-43f7-b2a1-2838368fe1b8
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85048749977
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3423-1531/work/39732420
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000435501600001
dc.descriptionThis research was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement no. H2020-MSCA-IF-2014-655661 to JDS).en
dc.description.abstractA genus is a taxonomic unit that may contain one species (monotypic) or thousands. Yet counts of genera or families are used to quantify diversity where species-level data are not available. High frequencies of monotypic genera (~30% of animals) have previously been scrutinized as an artefact of human classification. To test whether Linnean taxonomy conflicts with phylogeny, we compared idealized phylogenetic systematics in silico with real-world data. We generated highly replicated, simulated phylogenies under a variety of fixed speciation/extinction rates, imposed three independent taxonomic sorting algorithms on these clades (2.65 × 108 simulated species) and compared the resulting genus size data with quality-controlled taxonomy of animal groups (2.8 × 105 species). ‘Perfect’ phylogenetic systematics arrives at similar distributions to real-world taxonomy, regardless of the taxonomic algorithm. Rapid radiations occasionally produce a large genus when speciation rates are favourable; however, small genera can arise in many different ways, from individual lineage persistence and/or extinctions creating subdivisions within a clade. The consistency of this skew distribution in simulation and real-world data, at sufficiently large samples, indicates that specific aspects of its mathematical behaviour could be developed into generalized or nomothetic principles of the global frequency distributions of higher taxa. Importantly, Linnean taxonomy is a better-than-expected reflection of underlying evolutionary patterns.
dc.relation.ispartofZoological Journal of the Linnean Societyen
dc.rights© 2017 The Linnean Society of London. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at
dc.subjectBirth-death processen
dc.subjectLinnean taxonomyen
dc.subjectSpecies-within-genus statisticsen
dc.subjectTaxonomic ranken
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.titleHow big is a genus? Towards a nomothetic systematicsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record