Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSachs, Benjamin Alan
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-02T23:32:36Z
dc.date.available2018-06-02T23:32:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-26
dc.identifier.citationSachs , B A 2016 , ' III - Contractarianism as a political morality ' , Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , vol. 161 , no. I , pp. 49–67 . https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aow001en
dc.identifier.issn0066-7374
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 240546862
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: b488d98a-756d-45c0-ab32-c389f9425a84
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85009464466
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2307-7620/work/69029285
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/13679
dc.description.abstractContractarianism initially made its mark, in the seventeenth century, as a sort of theory of everything in ethics. But gradually philosophers became convinced that there were resources available outside contractarianism for settling important moral questions—for instance, ideas of human rights and the moral equality of persons. Then Rawls revived contractarianism with a more modest aim—namely, as a theory of justice. But even this agenda for contractarianism has been called into question, most notably by G.A. Cohen, who contends that we have other tools at our disposal for identifying the true conception of justice. So the question remains: how should contractarianism be construed if it is to provide answers to questions that cannot be answered in some other way? In my essay I offer a very simple answer: contractarianism should be construed as a political morality. I arrive at this answer by starting with contractarianism as a theory of everything and paring away the unappealing layers of contractarianism so understood. I begin by describing what contractarianism is. Then I dispense with contractarianism as a theory of state legitimacy, as a theory of interpersonal morality, and as a theory of justice. Finally, I distinguish political morality from the other already-mentioned areas of morality, and argue that contractarianism is a sensible theory of its grounds.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Aristotelian Societyen
dc.rights© 2016 The Aristotelian Society. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aow001en
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleIII - Contractarianism as a political moralityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Researchen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aow001
dc.description.statusNon peer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-06-02


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record