Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorStreet, Sally E.
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Thomas J. H.
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Alex
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Gillian R.
dc.contributor.authorLaland, Kevin N.
dc.contributor.authorCross, Catharine P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-31T09:30:08Z
dc.date.available2018-01-31T09:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-29
dc.identifier.citationStreet , S E , Morgan , T J H , Thornton , A , Brown , G R , Laland , K N & Cross , C P 2018 , ' Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning ' , Scientific Reports , vol. 8 , 1715 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8en
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252002566
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ff716a40-9e3b-487d-a738-ad141bba7bce
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85041282502
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000423428900003
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-0675-0780/work/60195731
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8110-8408/work/60427412
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2457-0900/work/60630319
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12637
dc.descriptionResearch supported in part by an ERC Advanced Grant to K.N.L. (EVOCULTURE, ref: 232823). A.T. was supported by a BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship (BB/H021817/1) and a grant from the ESRC (ES/M006042/1).en
dc.description.abstractWomen appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No experiment, however, has directly investigated whether women preferentially copy each other’s face preferences more than other preferences. Further, because prior experimental studies used artificial social information, the effect of real social information on attractiveness preferences is unknown. We collected attractiveness ratings of pictures of men’s faces, men’s hands, and abstract art given by heterosexual women, before and after they saw genuine social information gathered in real time from their peers. Ratings of faces were influenced by social information, but no more or less than were images of hands and abstract art. Our results suggest that evidence for domain-specific social learning mechanisms in humans is weaker than previously suggested.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsen
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2018, the authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.subjectMate choiceen
dc.subjectSocial learningen
dc.subjectHuman behaviouren
dc.subjectCultural evolutionen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleHuman mate-choice copying is domain-general social learningen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record