Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
MetadataShow full item record
Women appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No controlled experiment, however, has directly investigated whether women preferentially copy face preferences compared with other kinds of decision. Further, because prior experimental studies used artificial social information, the effect of real social information on attractiveness preferences is unknown. We collected attractiveness ratings of pictures of men’s faces, men’s hands, and abstract art given by heterosexual women, before and after participants saw genuine social information gathered in real time from their peers. Ratings of faces were influenced by social information, but no more or less so than were images of hands and abstract art. Our results suggest that evidence for domain-specific social learning mechanisms in humans is weaker than previously assumed.
Street , S E , Morgan , T J H , Thornton , A , Brown , G R , Laland , K N & Cross , C P 2018 , ' Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning ' Scientific Reports , vol. 8 , 1715 . DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8
Copyright (c) 2018, the authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
DescriptionResearch supported in part by an ERC Advanced Grant to K.N.L. (EVOCULTURE, ref: 232823). A.T. was supported by a BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship (BB/H021817/1) and a grant from the ESRC (ES/M006042/1).
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.